Markets that resolve cleanly, not contentiously.
Resolution oracles, dispute paths, fee structures, and market lifecycle. The category most teams underestimate: the contract is small, the resolution is everything. We design for the contested case, then verify the easy cases work too.
How we approach it.
Resolution oracle design
Single-source, optimistic with dispute, panel of judges, on-chain data feed, or a hybrid. Each model has a failure mode. We pick deliberately, not by default.
Dispute paths and bonding
Who can dispute, what the bond is, what happens to the bond, how long the dispute window stays open. Documented before launch, not after the first contested resolution.
Market lifecycle and fees
Listing, trading, resolution, payout, archival. Fee structures that align operator and resolver incentives without rewarding manipulation.
Liquidity and market making
AMM curves, LP incentives, settlement against external venues. We integrate where it makes sense, build native where the asset shape requires it.
When we are not the right fit.
We say no a lot. Saves both of us time.
- You want to launch markets on a topic that has no robust resolution source.
- You will not accept any oracle layer or dispute period for resolution.
- Your jurisdiction does not permit the market mechanic you are describing.
Want to see if it fits?
A 25-minute call with the Toolblox team. We scope your asset and tell you straight whether we can ship it.